anova technique and dunnett’s post hoc multiple comparative test Search Results


90
Viromer Transfection usp15 sirna
Usp15 Sirna, supplied by Viromer Transfection, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anova+technique+and+dunnett%E2%80%99s+post+hoc+multiple+comparative+test/usp15+sirna/pm37874479-366-12-36
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
usp15 sirna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
KEYENCE motion analysis software keyence vw-9000
Motion Analysis Software Keyence Vw 9000, supplied by KEYENCE, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anova+technique+and+dunnett%E2%80%99s+post+hoc+multiple+comparative+test/high+speed+camera+vw+9000/pmc08980959-109-22-21
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
motion analysis software keyence vw-9000 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
ATCC dunnetts multiple comparisons test against atcc 13880
Dunnetts Multiple Comparisons Test Against Atcc 13880, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anova+technique+and+dunnett%E2%80%99s+post+hoc+multiple+comparative+test/Serratia+marcescens+subsp%2E+marcescens+Bizio/pmc12077157__mbio%2E00559-25-s0004-3-8-13
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dunnetts multiple comparisons test against atcc 13880 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
RStudio biocunductor
Biocunductor, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anova+technique+and+dunnett%E2%80%99s+post+hoc+multiple+comparative+test/biocunductor/pmc07137489-78-9-28
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biocunductor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriginLab corp multiple-measure dunnett test
Multiple Measure Dunnett Test, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anova+technique+and+dunnett%E2%80%99s+post+hoc+multiple+comparative+test/multiple+measure+dunnett+test/pm40286149-294-9-16
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
multiple-measure dunnett test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Tocris dunnett s multiple comparisons test
Dunnett S Multiple Comparisons Test, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anova+technique+and+dunnett%E2%80%99s+post+hoc+multiple+comparative+test/DPCPX/pm39775928-105-9-46
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dunnett s multiple comparisons test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
CEM Corporation cem transfection method
Sequence used in this study and melting temperature ( T m ) of ASO/RNA or ASO/PNA
Cem Transfection Method, supplied by CEM Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anova+technique+and+dunnett%E2%80%99s+post+hoc+multiple+comparative+test/cem+transfection+method/pmc10693639-225-103-102
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cem transfection method - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Kaktovik Inupiat dunnett– tukey–kramer pairwise multiple comparison test
Sequence used in this study and melting temperature ( T m ) of ASO/RNA or ASO/PNA
Dunnett– Tukey–Kramer Pairwise Multiple Comparison Test, supplied by Kaktovik Inupiat, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anova+technique+and+dunnett%E2%80%99s+post+hoc+multiple+comparative+test/dunnett++tukey+kramer+pairwise+multiple+comparison+test/pm20617361-138-0-16
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dunnett– tukey–kramer pairwise multiple comparison test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Verlag GmbH anova followed by multiple dunnett’s test or fisher’s protected least significant difference (plsd)
Sequence used in this study and melting temperature ( T m ) of ASO/RNA or ASO/PNA
Anova Followed By Multiple Dunnett’s Test Or Fisher’s Protected Least Significant Difference (Plsd), supplied by Verlag GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anova+technique+and+dunnett%E2%80%99s+post+hoc+multiple+comparative+test/anova+followed+by+multiple+dunnett%E2%80%99s+test+or+fisher%E2%80%99s+protected+least+significant+difference++plsd+/pm21648068-90-14-3
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anova followed by multiple dunnett’s test or fisher’s protected least significant difference (plsd) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Sequence used in this study and melting temperature ( T m ) of ASO/RNA or ASO/PNA

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Dynamic and static control of the off-target interactions of antisense oligonucleotides using toehold chemistry

doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43714-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Sequence used in this study and melting temperature ( T m ) of ASO/RNA or ASO/PNA

Article Snippet: Fig. 6 Complementary PNAs suppress off-target hybridizations. a Schematic illustration of an in-cuvette FRET assay. b Hybridization kinetics were evaluated for the indicated ssASO and BROs using FRET ( n = 3 independent experiments). c The antisense effects of hApo1n/PNA(C9) and hApo1n/cGapmer on ApoB mRNA in Huh-7 cells using the CEM transfection method ( n = 6 biologically independent samples for control, n = 3 for BRO series; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to control, p values from left side; <0.0001, 0.0006, 0.6547). d The antisense effects of hApo1n and hApo1n/PNA(C5-C13) BROs in Huh-7 cells using the CEM transfection method ( n = 3 biologically independent samples; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to hApo1n, p values from left side; <0.0001, 0.9854, 0.99398, 0.4175, 0.0388, 0.0011, <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001). e The van’t Hoff analysis for the indicated ssASO and BROs ( n = 3 independent experiments). f Knockdown activities of on-target ApoB gene and three single-mismatch genes were compared for indicated hApo1n and BROs (hApo1n/PNA(C8), hApo1n/PNA(C9)) in Huh-7 cells exposed to 1 µM after 24 h of CEM transfection ( n = 3 biologically independent samples; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to control, p values from left side; ApoB: <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001; Copg: 0.0299, 0.1307, 0.1071; Mast2: 0.0012, 0.1826, 0.8253; Hltf: 0.0262, 0.9132, 0.4780). g Hybridization kinetics for on-target mRNA ( ApoB ) were evaluated for the indicated ssASO and BROs using FRET ( n = 3 independent experiments). h FRET assay of TAMRA-labeled hApo1nF and BHQ2-labeled mRNA mimics (Copg, Hltf). i FRET assay of TAMRA-labeled hApo1nF/PNA(C9) BRO and BHQ2-labeled mRNA mimics (Copg, Hltf).

Techniques: Sequencing

a Procedure for evaluation of cytotoxicity of mPCS1n ssASO and mPCS1n/PNA(C8) BRO in original and galactose-modified media. b PI staining of Huh-7 cells exposed to 2 µM mPCS1n ssASO and mPCS1n/PNA(C8) BRO after 48 h of CEM transfection ( n = 3 biologically independent samples). c Drug concentration-dependent assessment of cell viability ( n = 5 biologically independent samples) d Activity of caspases 3/7, 8, and 9 ( n = 4 biologically independent samples; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to control, p values from left side; glucose conditions: 0.0674, 0.5360 for caspase 8; 0.0077, 0.9104 for caspase 9; 0.032, 0.9571 for caspase 3/7; galactose conditions: <0.0001, 0.8379 for caspase 8; <0.0001, 0.7712 for caspase 9; <0.0001, 0.7933 for caspase 3/7). e the depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) with JC−1 dye were compared and evaluated for mPCS1n or mPCS1n/PNA(C8) BRO through transfection into Huh-7 cells using the CEM method ( n = 1) ( e ). ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05. “ns” indicates not significant ( p > 0.05). Data in Fig. 4c and d are presented as mean values ± SD. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Dynamic and static control of the off-target interactions of antisense oligonucleotides using toehold chemistry

doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43714-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Procedure for evaluation of cytotoxicity of mPCS1n ssASO and mPCS1n/PNA(C8) BRO in original and galactose-modified media. b PI staining of Huh-7 cells exposed to 2 µM mPCS1n ssASO and mPCS1n/PNA(C8) BRO after 48 h of CEM transfection ( n = 3 biologically independent samples). c Drug concentration-dependent assessment of cell viability ( n = 5 biologically independent samples) d Activity of caspases 3/7, 8, and 9 ( n = 4 biologically independent samples; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to control, p values from left side; glucose conditions: 0.0674, 0.5360 for caspase 8; 0.0077, 0.9104 for caspase 9; 0.032, 0.9571 for caspase 3/7; galactose conditions: <0.0001, 0.8379 for caspase 8; <0.0001, 0.7712 for caspase 9; <0.0001, 0.7933 for caspase 3/7). e the depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) with JC−1 dye were compared and evaluated for mPCS1n or mPCS1n/PNA(C8) BRO through transfection into Huh-7 cells using the CEM method ( n = 1) ( e ). ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05. “ns” indicates not significant ( p > 0.05). Data in Fig. 4c and d are presented as mean values ± SD. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Fig. 6 Complementary PNAs suppress off-target hybridizations. a Schematic illustration of an in-cuvette FRET assay. b Hybridization kinetics were evaluated for the indicated ssASO and BROs using FRET ( n = 3 independent experiments). c The antisense effects of hApo1n/PNA(C9) and hApo1n/cGapmer on ApoB mRNA in Huh-7 cells using the CEM transfection method ( n = 6 biologically independent samples for control, n = 3 for BRO series; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to control, p values from left side; <0.0001, 0.0006, 0.6547). d The antisense effects of hApo1n and hApo1n/PNA(C5-C13) BROs in Huh-7 cells using the CEM transfection method ( n = 3 biologically independent samples; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to hApo1n, p values from left side; <0.0001, 0.9854, 0.99398, 0.4175, 0.0388, 0.0011, <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001). e The van’t Hoff analysis for the indicated ssASO and BROs ( n = 3 independent experiments). f Knockdown activities of on-target ApoB gene and three single-mismatch genes were compared for indicated hApo1n and BROs (hApo1n/PNA(C8), hApo1n/PNA(C9)) in Huh-7 cells exposed to 1 µM after 24 h of CEM transfection ( n = 3 biologically independent samples; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to control, p values from left side; ApoB: <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001; Copg: 0.0299, 0.1307, 0.1071; Mast2: 0.0012, 0.1826, 0.8253; Hltf: 0.0262, 0.9132, 0.4780). g Hybridization kinetics for on-target mRNA ( ApoB ) were evaluated for the indicated ssASO and BROs using FRET ( n = 3 independent experiments). h FRET assay of TAMRA-labeled hApo1nF and BHQ2-labeled mRNA mimics (Copg, Hltf). i FRET assay of TAMRA-labeled hApo1nF/PNA(C9) BRO and BHQ2-labeled mRNA mimics (Copg, Hltf).

Techniques: Modification, Staining, Transfection, Concentration Assay, Activity Assay, Comparison, Membrane

a Schematic illustration of an in-cuvette FRET assay. b Hybridization kinetics were evaluated for the indicated ssASO and BROs using FRET ( n = 3 independent experiments). c The antisense effects of hApo1n/PNA(C9) and hApo1n/cGapmer on ApoB mRNA in Huh-7 cells using the CEM transfection method ( n = 6 biologically independent samples for control, n = 3 for BRO series; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to control, p values from left side; <0.0001, 0.0006, 0.6547). d The antisense effects of hApo1n and hApo1n/PNA(C5-C13) BROs in Huh-7 cells using the CEM transfection method ( n = 3 biologically independent samples; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to hApo1n, p values from left side; <0.0001, 0.9854, 0.99398, 0.4175, 0.0388, 0.0011, <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001). e The van’t Hoff analysis for the indicated ssASO and BROs ( n = 3 independent experiments). f Knockdown activities of on-target ApoB gene and three single-mismatch genes were compared for indicated hApo1n and BROs (hApo1n/PNA(C8), hApo1n/PNA(C9)) in Huh-7 cells exposed to 1 µM after 24 h of CEM transfection ( n = 3 biologically independent samples; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to control, p values from left side; ApoB: <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001; Copg: 0.0299, 0.1307, 0.1071; Mast2: 0.0012, 0.1826, 0.8253; Hltf: 0.0262, 0.9132, 0.4780). g Hybridization kinetics for on-target mRNA ( ApoB ) were evaluated for the indicated ssASO and BROs using FRET ( n = 3 independent experiments). h FRET assay of TAMRA-labeled hApo1nF and BHQ2-labeled mRNA mimics (Copg, Hltf). i FRET assay of TAMRA-labeled hApo1nF/PNA(C9) BRO and BHQ2-labeled mRNA mimics (Copg, Hltf). Data in Fig. 6b–d and g–i are presented as mean values ± SD. ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05. “ns” indicates not significant ( p > 0.05). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Dynamic and static control of the off-target interactions of antisense oligonucleotides using toehold chemistry

doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43714-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schematic illustration of an in-cuvette FRET assay. b Hybridization kinetics were evaluated for the indicated ssASO and BROs using FRET ( n = 3 independent experiments). c The antisense effects of hApo1n/PNA(C9) and hApo1n/cGapmer on ApoB mRNA in Huh-7 cells using the CEM transfection method ( n = 6 biologically independent samples for control, n = 3 for BRO series; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to control, p values from left side; <0.0001, 0.0006, 0.6547). d The antisense effects of hApo1n and hApo1n/PNA(C5-C13) BROs in Huh-7 cells using the CEM transfection method ( n = 3 biologically independent samples; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to hApo1n, p values from left side; <0.0001, 0.9854, 0.99398, 0.4175, 0.0388, 0.0011, <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001). e The van’t Hoff analysis for the indicated ssASO and BROs ( n = 3 independent experiments). f Knockdown activities of on-target ApoB gene and three single-mismatch genes were compared for indicated hApo1n and BROs (hApo1n/PNA(C8), hApo1n/PNA(C9)) in Huh-7 cells exposed to 1 µM after 24 h of CEM transfection ( n = 3 biologically independent samples; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to control, p values from left side; ApoB: <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001; Copg: 0.0299, 0.1307, 0.1071; Mast2: 0.0012, 0.1826, 0.8253; Hltf: 0.0262, 0.9132, 0.4780). g Hybridization kinetics for on-target mRNA ( ApoB ) were evaluated for the indicated ssASO and BROs using FRET ( n = 3 independent experiments). h FRET assay of TAMRA-labeled hApo1nF and BHQ2-labeled mRNA mimics (Copg, Hltf). i FRET assay of TAMRA-labeled hApo1nF/PNA(C9) BRO and BHQ2-labeled mRNA mimics (Copg, Hltf). Data in Fig. 6b–d and g–i are presented as mean values ± SD. ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05. “ns” indicates not significant ( p > 0.05). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Fig. 6 Complementary PNAs suppress off-target hybridizations. a Schematic illustration of an in-cuvette FRET assay. b Hybridization kinetics were evaluated for the indicated ssASO and BROs using FRET ( n = 3 independent experiments). c The antisense effects of hApo1n/PNA(C9) and hApo1n/cGapmer on ApoB mRNA in Huh-7 cells using the CEM transfection method ( n = 6 biologically independent samples for control, n = 3 for BRO series; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to control, p values from left side; <0.0001, 0.0006, 0.6547). d The antisense effects of hApo1n and hApo1n/PNA(C5-C13) BROs in Huh-7 cells using the CEM transfection method ( n = 3 biologically independent samples; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to hApo1n, p values from left side; <0.0001, 0.9854, 0.99398, 0.4175, 0.0388, 0.0011, <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001). e The van’t Hoff analysis for the indicated ssASO and BROs ( n = 3 independent experiments). f Knockdown activities of on-target ApoB gene and three single-mismatch genes were compared for indicated hApo1n and BROs (hApo1n/PNA(C8), hApo1n/PNA(C9)) in Huh-7 cells exposed to 1 µM after 24 h of CEM transfection ( n = 3 biologically independent samples; one-way ANOVA followed by two-sided Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests comparing to control, p values from left side; ApoB: <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001; Copg: 0.0299, 0.1307, 0.1071; Mast2: 0.0012, 0.1826, 0.8253; Hltf: 0.0262, 0.9132, 0.4780). g Hybridization kinetics for on-target mRNA ( ApoB ) were evaluated for the indicated ssASO and BROs using FRET ( n = 3 independent experiments). h FRET assay of TAMRA-labeled hApo1nF and BHQ2-labeled mRNA mimics (Copg, Hltf). i FRET assay of TAMRA-labeled hApo1nF/PNA(C9) BRO and BHQ2-labeled mRNA mimics (Copg, Hltf).

Techniques: Hybridization, Transfection, Comparison, Labeling